What is Ryle’s central argument against Cartesian Dualism regarding an explanation of the mind/body problem?

Comments

1. DJP says:

   January 30, 2011 at 11:19 am

   I have an argument against Descartes’ argument, it is not likely to Ryle (I think that is? From Sartre? S ground?). But it is always int? Esting. . . “I believe that thinking things exist therfore I exist.” This confuses the subject and object. When? V? Ment “I think” exists that does not prove that he is? I? which makes the pins? e. For example, k? it nnte super-consciousness that lt contains within itself? the result of “thinking” as lt the fact contains? Gatorade, which seems t red. “But what, I To Do? Ends No, not? Necessarily the super-consciousness.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

Click here to cancel reply.

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

If you are human, count objects:
	I see:
		springs
		bars
		balls
Ironclad CAPTCHA (Security Stronghold)